Question: Are proposals implemented instantaneously or piecemeal? I would assume you'd want to flip the switches after they are defined?
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nic Evans <nich...@gmail.com> wrote: > I withdraw the proposal titled 'Granular Payday' and submit the > following proposal: > > Title: Granular Paydays (v2) > Adoption Index: 1 > Author: nichdel > Co-author(s): Aris, o > > [v2: Changed the switches to be natural, fixed not specifying what > offices are paid, and deleted a typo that suggested the report was paid > instead of the player.] > > Flip the Payrate of every office to 2. > > Amend 2484 (Payday) to read, in full: > > Payrate is a natural office switch, tracked by the ADoP, with a > default value of 2. Report Rate is a natural office switch, > tracked by the ADoP, with a default value of 2. > > [Add in Report Rate, which can be adjusted by-office.] > > At the start of each month, if Agora's Balance is not 0 or less, > Agora SHALL pay each player 10 shinies. > > [Nothing changed here.] > > Immediately afterward, for each report published last month (in > chronological order of publication), Agora SHALL pay the > publisher of the report the Report Rate for the office the report > is associated with unless paying would leave Agora's balance at a > negative value. > > [Pay out for published reports before offices, in a way similar to how > offices are paid. It's very important to note that, if Report Rates > were not equal, it'd be possible to pay the 1st and 3rd reports but not > the 2nd, if the 2nd would make Agora's balance negative but the 3rd > would not.] > > Immediately afterward, for each office (first in ascending order > of Payrate, then in descending alphabetical order of office > name), Agora SHALL pay the holder of the office that office's > Payrate value unless paying would leave Agora's balance at a > negative value. > > [This paragraph is rewritten to hopefully be more clear, but it is > functionally the same except for changing '0 or less' to 'negative'.] > > >
