I think you're saying the G. is still the judge for this? If true,
you're not the judge as nobody could've made you the judge if one was
already assigned. Also, nothing comepls em to issue the same judgement
as you.
On 05/19/2017 06:29 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I judge CFJ 3488 TRUE. Further, the person known as G. must do so in
"do so in a timely fashion after this becomes possible," per Rule 591.
I find this because the judgement was assigned to G. under Rule 991
when he was a player. Finally, no rule caused G. to lose his status as
judge and Rule 591 only states that the judge must issue a judgement
with no limitation on who that judge may be.
----
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
