Whew. I wasn't excited about that. Gaelan
> On May 19, 2017, at 12:32 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I would like to judge this. > > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > >> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I explicitly ask to not judge this CFJ >> >>> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:06 Josh T <draconicdarkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I submit a Call for Judgement for the following statement: >>> >>> "Every statement is ambiguous." >>> >>> I present the following argument as caller's evidence: >>> * Every statement is written in one language. >>> * Translation between any two languages is inherently ambiguous. >>> * Therefore, every statement is ambiguous at least in every language >>> the statement was not originally written in. >>> * Agora does not formally make preference to any one language, and >>> recognizes differences in dialect (CFJ 1439). >>> * Thus, every statement is ambiguous. >>> >>> 天火狐 >
