How else would you parse it? If there is no other logical reading, I’d argue 
that it was clear and ambiguous, and therefore it was a valid intent.
> On May 20, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm unsure if  `I intend an Agency with 24 Hour’s notice with the following 
> information` is a valid intent to establish an agency.
> 
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:quazieno...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Ah-ha!  Thanks.
> 
> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com 
> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28175.html 
> <http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28175.html>
> 
> On May 20, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:quazieno...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> MKD?  I can't find the initial intent?
>> 
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:10 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com 
>> <mailto:g...@canishe.com>> wrote:
>> I resolve my intent to create MKD.
>> 
>> Gaelan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to