"clear and ambiguous" not *un*ambiguous? ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: > How else would you parse it? If there is no other logical reading, I’d > argue that it was clear and ambiguous, and therefore it was a valid intent. > > On May 20, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I'm unsure if `I intend an Agency with 24 Hour’s notice with the > following information` is a valid intent to establish an agency. > > On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:38 PM Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ah-ha! Thanks. >> >> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:37 PM Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg28175.html >>> >>> On May 20, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> MKD? I can't find the initial intent? >>> >>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 12:10 Gaelan Steele <g...@canishe.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I resolve my intent to create MKD. >>>> >>>> Gaelan >>>> >>> >
