I’ll note that you appear to be reproducing Peter Suber’s thesis, one piece at a time, and adding paradoxical constraints in the process:
> If appropriate qualifications are made for the informality of custom and > etiquette, a case could be made that normal social life is just a system of > indefinite tiers. Near the top of the "difficult" end of the series, below > entrenched cultural norms, are actual laws, rising through case precedents, > regulations and statutes, to constitutional rules. At the bottom of the scale > are those rules of personal behavior that individuals may amend unilaterally > without incurring censure. Above those are rules for which amendment is > increasingly costly, starting with (say) costs on the order of furrowed brows > and clucked tongues, passing through indignant blows and vengeful homicide. In any case, please continue. This is an interesting experiment. -o > On May 21, 2017, at 7:12 PM, CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > I establish the following Agency: (This is my 24 hours notice) > > Title: Everyone is Playing Nomic (EPN) > Agents: All persons > Powers: The content in this Powers section below the BIG LINE can be modified > at will by any Agent by announcing this intent, as long as they comply to the > rules written below the BIG LINE. All content below the BIG LINE have no > formal powers aside from restricting what Agents may edit into it. > > The next 54 characters that appear after the colon in this sentence is the > BIG LINE: > > ----------HELLO MY FRIENDS I AM THE BIG LINE---------- > > Nobody can make modifications to this document which would prevent any subset > of all possible modifications to be able to be made nor remove this sentence.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
