Wow - super weird, e-mail client did something super funny there - sorry. On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:56 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > Er, according to both by sent-mail and inbox return, it went to > Business... Can > someone confirm? > > Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 10:36:16 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > To: Agora Business <agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Quazie wrote: > > Not a public forum - Please resend G. > > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 10:40 AM Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 22 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > > > People can stop objecting because it is already dead. > > > > People can remove objections, so it's prudent not to rely on a > single > > person's (I only saw one person object to every one of them, though > > maybe I missed some). > > > > > As to the Victory Election, G. is not yet an option. > > > > I'm curious about the wording of victory elections: > > non-player persons > > can also become valid options during the voting period by > > announcement. > > Is there consensus that "A person can... by announcement" means > that > > only that person can announce for emself? Or that anyone can > announce > > for anyone else? > > > > I'm also curious about what happens to vote cast for an option when > > it's only added as a valid option after the vote is cast, so: > > > > I hereby make myself a valid option for the current Victory > Election. > > > > To test the above question: > > > > I hereby make OscarMeyr a valid option for the current Victory > Election. > > > > > > > > > > >
