I still don't buy this. I surrounded the apathy attempt in "this section is not 
part of the report"/"the report resumes below." Regardless of whether that 
worked, I think that makes it pretty clear I did not intend to ratify that into 
the ruleset. 

Gaelan

> On May 23, 2017, at 3:50 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus 
> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> ----

Reply via email to