On Sat, 27 May 2017, CuddleBeam wrote:
I CFJ the following statement:
"If this sentence is true, then Agora is Ossified."
This seems a pretty clear DISMISS to me. Rule 591:
The valid judgements, based on the facts of the case at the time
the CFJ was initiated, are TRUE, FALSE, and DISMISS. DISMISS is
appropriate if the statement is malformed, undecidable,
irrelevant to the game, if insufficient information exists to
make a judgement with reasonable effort, or the statement is
otherwise not able to be answered TRUE or FALSE.
Also the second paragraph of rule 217 may apply:
Definitions and prescriptions in the rules are only to be
applied using direct, forward reasoning; in particular, an
absurdity that can be concluded from the assumption that a
statement about rule-defined concepts is false does not
constitute proof that it is true. Definitions in lower-powered
Rules do not overrule common-sense interpretations or common
definitions of terms in higher-powered rules.
Also, someone here's bound to have tried using Curry's paradox before.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
