No, it should be DISMISS because the sentence is malformed and can not have a true/false value assigned. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On May 26, 2017, at 10:32 PM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It's false because there's no reason for it to be true. None of your > arguments are relevant - the truthiness of the statement is unrelated to > ossification. > > Additionally 'if this sentence is false, then agora is ossified' is also > false, because it's just untrue. > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 19:11 CuddleBeam <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Getting stuff fixed when I see a potential flaw in it I could use goes > against scamming spirit. > > So, I want to try out a thing because I'm not too familiar with scams on > Agora and this works as a test run. > > I CFJ the following statement: > > "If this sentence is true, then Agora is Ossified." > > I present the following as Arguments: > * CFJ 3498's Judgement. "Judging this as TRUE would cause Agora to become > ossified (proposals are created by announcement, announcements must be > unambiguous). Therefore, it is IMPOSSIBLE to judge this CFJ as TRUE. > Therefore, I judge as FALSE." > > * If it were TRUE, Agora would become Ossified, therefore the Judgement > should be FALSE. > > * It is IMPOSSIBLE to judge this CFJ as TRUE, (because its actually > undecidable), therefore the Judgement should be FALSE (would you choose to > approach through "It is IMPOSSIBLE to judge this CFJ as TRUE->ergo-> I judge > as FALSE"). > > * Therefore, it's FALSE.
