This response makes me think you didn't read or comprehend my response. And your recent behavior makes me think you don't attempt to comprehend the rules before acting.
On May 29, 2017 10:35, "CuddleBeam" <cuddleb...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >The rules allow withdrawing ballots and proposals explicitly, and explicitly > mention what happens, so under those conditions it's clearly regulated. > > I disagree. > > An action is regulated if: > * (1) the Rules limit, allow, enable, or permit its performance > - There is no limitation, permission or enabling (unless 'unregulated' > actions are allowed by the Rules, in which case, they're regulated, because > they're allowed, and all actions in the universe are regulated as per my > other proof, but I'm assuming that isn't true for the sake of argument) > > * (2) describe the circumstances under which the action would succeed or > fail > - There actually is no description about how a withdrawal of *objections* > would succeed or not. Withdrawal of objections =/= withdrawal of ballots. > Or it is, in which case, I should be able to expolate other terms out of > their context and scam like that. > > * (3) the action would, as part of its effect, modify information for > which some player is required to be a recordkeepor." > - This is the odd one, because it seems that I'm not required to track > until I need to actually publish, so it seems to me that withdrawals before > that event are unregulated, and after it, are regulated. >
