On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:04 PM, V.J Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > More interestingly, I believe some of those are more than a week > > > overdue. If failing to judge triggers the statute of limitations on > > > the point the judgments become overdue, these might be invalid. > > > > It depends on whether failing to complete a duty in a timely fashion > > is an infraction that happens at a specific time, or whether it happens > > continuously until the duty is completed or obviated. I had a brief look > > through the CFJ archives, but didn’t find any obvious candidates for > > case law… anyone else? If not, do we need a CFJ to resolve this? > > My imperfect memory is that a there's a CFJ that says the rule is violated > at the moment the clock expires, and it's a single violation that happens > at that moment. > > Can't remember the statement context so some digging is needed. If anyone > else also digs, for search purposes "In a timely fashion" used to be called > "as soon as possible". > > -G.
It's covered in three cases: CFJs 2393-2395.
