Really? I thought it was to "anchor" the gamestate in case of dispute or ambiguity so that the game can continue, but here there really isnt one.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 5:09 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > i mean, that's why ratification exists. > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Knowingly including inaccurate information doesn't feel right to me. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 4:53 AM, Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 10:47 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > Let's just ratify everyone who we thought had stamps into having them. > >> > >> Not objecting to my last Stamps Addendum or my last weekly Secretary’s > >> report will do that, thankfully. > >> > >> -o > >> > > > > > > -- > From V.J Rada >
