On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
1a. Whatever fix we undertake should _not_ somehow resurrect actions we
had all understood, within the context of that mistaken reading of the
rules, to be ineffective or impossible at the time they were performed.
There are a few shiny transactions that clearly didn’t happen no matter
what version of the rules you use, such as my attempt to claim a reward
for a proposal which had not been assessed.
As I recall, both of Cuddlebeam's Stamp scam attempts fall under this too,
but not Gaelan Steele's response.
(Otherwise, your 1-3 are pretty much what I thought too.)
Greetings,
Ørjan.
