On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
I looked through every MAY, there's no probs having it imply CAN in all cases.
Hm looks like you're right. I guess the need for the opposite is so rare it can just be written more explicitly.
Greetings, Ørjan.
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
I looked through every MAY, there's no probs having it imply CAN in all cases.
Hm looks like you're right. I guess the need for the opposite is so rare it can just be written more explicitly.
Greetings, Ørjan.