No bc that would invalidate our treating of rule conflicts for 3 years. On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Actually, this isn’t needed. All we need to do is go through and specify per > rule what the power is supposed to be. > ---- > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 7:14 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Could we make the change to Rule 106 retroactive to avoid cleanup. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 7:09 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Title: Minor fixes 2.0 >>> AI: 3 >>> In rule 2423, "First Among Equals", replace the text "The holder of >>> the office of Prime Minister's voting strength is increased by 1 on >>> all Agoran decisions other than a elections of the Prime Minister." >>> with "The holder of the office of Prime Minister's voting strength is >>> increased by 1 on all Agoran decisions other than elections for the >>> office of Prime Minister" >>> >>> If, in rule 2496 "Rewards", the words "Publishing a duty-fulfilling >>> report: 5 shinies" are not followed by the words "This reward can be >>> claimed a maximum of once per office per week for a weekly report, and >>> once per office per month for a monthly report.", add those words >>> immediately after "Publishing a duty-fulfilling report: 5 shinies" >>> >>> In rule 2451 "Executive orders", remove all instances of the word "current". >>> >>> Change the power of rule 2451, "Executive Orders" to 2 and replace the >>> text "The Prime Minister issues a specified Card to a specified >>> player. The reason for the card MAY be any grievance held by the Prime >>> Minister, not necessarily a violation of the rules, against the person >>> to whom the Card is issued." with "The Prime Minister issues a >>> specified Card to a specified player. The reason for the card MAY be >>> any grievance held by the Prime Minister, not necessarily a violation >>> of the rules, against the person to whom the Card is issued. The >>> previous sentence takes priority over rule 2426 entitled "Cards"". >>> [COMMENTARY: The rule allowing the PM to issue people cards for no >>> reason is lower than the rule banning that behaviour"] >>> >>> In rule 106 "Adopting proposals", replace any instances of the word >>> "minimum" with the word "maximum" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From V.J. Rada >> >
-- >From V.J. Rada
