Read line 1 of the pledge.  If part of the pledge is saying I CAN revoke it 
(including a method), 
I can do so as part of keeping the pledge, I assume.

On Fri, 15 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> There's a proposal up for non-forever pledges.
> 
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 3:46 AM, Quazie <quazieno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>       You can't revoke pledges
>       On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 18:44 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>       I intend to revoke the below pledge with 4 days notice.  It was made 
> while
>       I was a non-player and CFJs were free for me.
> 
>       (if I do this, the proposal will now make me party to an agreement 
> without consent,
>       but now that it's pointed out that I can be forced to pay for others' 
> cfjs, I don't
>       want to leave it around long enough to revoke it after the proposal 
> passes)
> 
>       On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>       > Create a pledge owned by G., whose terms are
>       >
>       >     {
>       >          This pledge is known as The Prosecutor's Office
>       >
>       >          1.  I CAN revoke or alter this pledge by giving 4 Days 
> Notice.
>       >
>       >          2.  If a CFJ is submitted to The Prosecutor's Office 
> (private or
>       >              public to me, but not in Discussion), I shall follow the
>       >              following formal process to resolve the matter of
>       >              controversy:
>       >
>       >              a.  I shall enter it into the bottom of the Judicial 
> Queue.
>       >
>       >              b.  At most once per day, and and most 5 times per week, 
> I'll
>       >                  initiate an Agoran Call for Judgement on the CFJ on 
> the
>       >                  top of the Judicial Queue (also barring judges as
>       >                  requested by the submitter).
>       >
>       >              c.  By request, the submitter may remain anonymous.
>       >
>       >              d.  Absolutely free of charge, as able, I'll research and
>       >                  add gratuitous arguments in favor of the submitter's
>       >                  position, and I'll not argue against the submitter's
>       >                  position except in private with the submitter.
>       >
>       >         -G.
>       >     }
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Reply via email to