> On Sep 16, 2017, at 1:54 AM, Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
>> Amend rule 2450 ("Pledges") to read, in full:
>>
>> {
>> Pledges are an indestructible fixed asset. Ownership of pledges
>> is restricted to persons. The Referee is the recordkeepor of
>> pledges. Creating, destroying, modifying, and transferring
>> pledges are secured.
>
>> Destroy every pledge.
>
> I believe a proposal cannot destroy an indestructible asset.Ah, crud, you’re right. Rule 2166: > An indestructible asset is one defined as such by it backing document, and > CANNOT be destroyed except by a rule specifically addressing the destruction > of indestructible assets or that asset in particular. Moving that clause to that position was meant to end-run the question of whether existing pledges convert. However, the way I judged CFJ 3559 probably implies that I can insert a clause to the effect of “No clause of this proposal CAN create pledges implicitly” and have that work the way I want, instead. I could also create a transient rule at the start of the proposal, and repeal it at the end, but that feels like an extreme solution. -o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
