On 09/25/17 18:38, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > I CFJ on the statement: > > In the below quoted message, VJ Rada endorsed G. > > Argument: Rule 2127 states > > Casting a vote endorsing another voter is equivalent to > conditionally casting a vote whose value is the same as the most > common value (if any) among that voter's valid votes on that > decision. > > It seems to me that VJ Radas votes are equivalent to what's stated in > the last part of that, and thus are endorsements.
This seems to rely on how you interpret the intent of 2127: Creating a new action by defining it, or describing the effects of an existing action. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: > >> I vote as G. does. >> >> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: >>>> 7899* G. 2.0 Arbitor's Union G. >>>> 1 AP >>>> 7900* o 2.0 Come What May o >>>> 1 AP >>>> 7901* o, [1] 3.0 Make Your Home Shine o >>>> 6 sh. >>>> 7902* G. 1.0 Switch no-ops G. >>>> 1 AP >>>> 7903* G. 2.0 Numerical switches v2 G. >>>> 1 AP >>>> 7904* G., 天火狐 1.0 Such is Karma v2 Aris 1 >>>> AP >>> >>> I vote FOR all of these. -G. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
