Or rather, failed to judge On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:14 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > My plan would be to use some combination of my two PM votes, grok's > habit of voting with gFP, Celestial Fire-Fox's agency and ridiculously > high quorums to try and strongarm it, even though I'm sure others > would simply ignore me. > > Talking of moots, have you ever resolved that moot on the CFJ I judged? > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> >> I did wonder if it was something like that :p >> >> (If one does turn up truly unjudged I would try to get it resolved). >> >> Also: even if you judge on your win, you're just fast-tracking it for >> moot, there's really no endgame where a wrong CFJ stands and >> becomes precedent AFAICT. >> >> In the past when there's been an obvious bad faith judge, a parallel >> CFJ is just called in the mean time and everyone ignores the bad one >> pretty much. >> >> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my >>> frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them >>> by revealing this was invalid and I still had certiorari. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > Follow up, 3110 was judged by Murphy 24 Oct 2011. >>> > >>> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >> Please please do not do this without asking. There are a ream of >>> >> court cases that have been judged but were not put in the official >>> >> Court online records. I have been catching up about 10 a month on the >>> >> back end from my email archive and updated about 50 so far. >>> >> In doing so, of those 50 I only found 1 wit hough a judgement. >>> >> I'm happy to do the research when you pick one, but before you >>> >> grab it. >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >> > I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use >>> >> > Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, I use >>> >> > Certiorari to assign it to myself. >>> >> > >>> >> > The statement of the CFJ is this: >>> >> > >>> >> > I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, by >>> >> > means >>> >> > of sending this message. >>> >> > >>> >> > My judgement is UNDETERMINED. See 3111 and 3109, >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > -- >>> >> > From V.J. Rada >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >>> >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
-- >From V.J. Rada
