CFJ 3509 is restrictive. On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:00 AM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I never used a power of the office. If I actually used certiorari to > judge my own CFJ, that would be a different story. > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:59 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> >> I'm sure the referee realizes that the timely fashion response will stretch >> into >> next week's supply of cards. (And if ever there was a case for Pink Slip, >> it's this one). >> >> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> " A person SHALL NOT make a public statement that is a lie. A statment is >>> a lie >>> if its publisher either knew or believed it to be not to be true at the >>> time >>> e published it (or, in the case of an action, not to be effective), and it >>> was made with the intent to mislead. Merely quoting a statement does not >>> constitute making it for the purposes of this rule." >>> >>> Whoops. This attempt was certainly illegal. Although, unless the card >>> issued to nichdel didn't work, there's nothing the referee can do >>> about it. >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > I ... thought I did? On mobile now, but planning to catch up with all the >>> > tasks later today and will check. >>> > >>> > There are "bad" judgements that were never appealed or were forced >>> > through similarly, and the result was an immediate follow up CFJ saying >>> > the earlier one was wrong and overriding the precedent. >>> > >>> > There might be some interesting end play and discussion about forcing >>> > officers to disobey rules, but in the end CFJs are only guidelines. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >> My plan would be to use some combination of my two PM votes, grok's >>> >> habit of voting with gFP, Celestial Fire-Fox's agency and ridiculously >>> >> high quorums to try and strongarm it, even though I'm sure others >>> >> would simply ignore me. >>> >> >>> >> Talking of moots, have you ever resolved that moot on the CFJ I judged? >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > I did wonder if it was something like that :p >>> >> > >>> >> > (If one does turn up truly unjudged I would try to get it resolved). >>> >> > >>> >> > Also: even if you judge on your win, you're just fast-tracking it for >>> >> > moot, there's really no endgame where a wrong CFJ stands and >>> >> > becomes precedent AFAICT. >>> >> > >>> >> > In the past when there's been an obvious bad faith judge, a parallel >>> >> > CFJ is just called in the mean time and everyone ignores the bad one >>> >> > pretty much. >>> >> > >>> >> > On Thu, 28 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >> >> Sorry yeah, my plan was p much to get people to call CFJs on my >>> >> >> frivolous win attempt thinking they were safe and then tricking them >>> >> >> by revealing this was invalid and I still had certiorari. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Kerim Aydin >>> >> >> <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > Follow up, 3110 was judged by Murphy 24 Oct 2011. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> >> >> >> Please please do not do this without asking. There are a ream of >>> >> >> >> court cases that have been judged but were not put in the official >>> >> >> >> Court online records. I have been catching up about 10 a month on >>> >> >> >> the >>> >> >> >> back end from my email archive and updated about 50 so far. >>> >> >> >> In doing so, of those 50 I only found 1 wit hough a judgement. >>> >> >> >> I'm happy to do the research when you pick one, but before you >>> >> >> >> grab it. >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote: >>> >> >> >> > I found heaps of CFJs that seem to be never judged. I plan to use >>> >> >> >> > Certiorari to judge them all like a boss. The first one is 3110, >>> >> >> >> > I use >>> >> >> >> > Certiorari to assign it to myself. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > The statement of the CFJ is this: >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > I (Pavitra) satisfy the Victory Condition of Being Pavitra, >>> >> >> >> > by means >>> >> >> >> > of sending this message. >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > My judgement is UNDETERMINED. See 3111 and 3109, >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> > -- >>> >> >> >> > From V.J. Rada >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >> From V.J. Rada >>> >> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> From V.J. Rada >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> From V.J. Rada >>> >> > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada
-- >From V.J. Rada
