No, yeah, the proposal was rejected anyway. As I recall it repealed
the already-repealed dictatorship and existed only for the purpose of
a CFJ. I'm just doing this because of the uncontroversial nature of
GOD, the amount of reports it existed in, and the fact that SOME game
actions rested on it.

You're mistaken though that you can't change the existence of
proposals by RWO: precedent is clear that you can create proposals
with it.

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 12:46 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 18:18 +1000, VJ Rada wrote:
>> An agency has been listed for a long time called "G is Overlord of
>> Dunce". Is is a verb, so that agency is clearly not an agency. The
>> problem? That agency was used months ago (like...May) to create
>> another agency, which was used to pend a proposal!
>
> The existence of a proposal is automatically ratified seven days after
> it resolves as ADOPTED. (If the proposal gets REJECTED, it doesn't
> really matter whether it existed or not.) So it's unlikely that this
> can cause damage to the ruleset.
>
> If it did, RWO won't save you; you can't change the ruleset via RWO.
>
> --
> ais523



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to