So, CFJ 3563 read as follows:
The Green card o. issued emself in the below message was illegally
issued, as the green card e issued nichdel was legally issued.
and the caller barred Publius Scribonius Scholasticus.
This left the Caller, o, nichdel and Publius with conflicts of interest
or being ineligible to be assigned. A difficulty. Further, it just
seems to be a miscarriage of justice to lump multiple cards into one
CFJ.
I suggest the following criminal process reforms with the following
principles (not rushing to do it this week, this is for discussion):
1. Only a defendant (the carded) can call a case questioning whether
the card was correct. E can bar someone of course.
2. E can do it for free (protecting eir right as per R217, and removing
incentives for bundling cards into one CFJ).
3. Standards of evidence are specified for this type of case (beyond a
reasonable doubt? or should it be preponderance of evidence).
4. Any case questioning a Card that doesn't use this process (e.g.
called by a non-defendant) should be DISMISSED and referred to this
process.
The trickiest part is how punishment effects are applied - how to
suspend (or not suspend then) during this process.
Thoughts?
