Mine is based on the Roman court system and integrates civil and criminal procedures. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Oct 1, 2017, at 6:12 PM, Aris Merchant > <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Is everyone working on one of these? P.S.S., what are you planning for > your court reform? > > -Aris > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > <p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I like these ideas and will try to incorporate them into my upcoming courts >> overhaul. >> ---- >> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com >> >> >> >>> On Oct 1, 2017, at 2:00 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> So, CFJ 3563 read as follows: >>> The Green card o. issued emself in the below message was illegally >>> issued, as the green card e issued nichdel was legally issued. >>> and the caller barred Publius Scribonius Scholasticus. >>> >>> This left the Caller, o, nichdel and Publius with conflicts of interest >>> or being ineligible to be assigned. A difficulty. Further, it just >>> seems to be a miscarriage of justice to lump multiple cards into one >>> CFJ. >>> >>> I suggest the following criminal process reforms with the following >>> principles (not rushing to do it this week, this is for discussion): >>> >>> 1. Only a defendant (the carded) can call a case questioning whether >>> the card was correct. E can bar someone of course. >>> >>> 2. E can do it for free (protecting eir right as per R217, and removing >>> incentives for bundling cards into one CFJ). >>> >>> 3. Standards of evidence are specified for this type of case (beyond a >>> reasonable doubt? or should it be preponderance of evidence). >>> >>> 4. Any case questioning a Card that doesn't use this process (e.g. >>> called by a non-defendant) should be DISMISSED and referred to this >>> process. >>> >>> The trickiest part is how punishment effects are applied - how to >>> suspend (or not suspend then) during this process. >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
