On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > I believe you got it backwards and meant to judge it FALSE. > > I also believe that this was an INEFFECTIVE assignment, because for some > reason our > CFJ system for some reason platonically disallows invalid judgments. Can we > fix that > please?
"Valid" just means a possible judgement value, so an attempt to judge a case FISH would be ineffective. What you're thinking of is "appropriate". Inappropriate judgements are still valid ones.
