On Tue, 3 Oct 2017 at 21:23 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > I believe you got it backwards and meant to judge it FALSE. > > > > I also believe that this was an INEFFECTIVE assignment, because for some > reason our > > CFJ system for some reason platonically disallows invalid judgments. Can > we fix that > > please? > > "Valid" just means a possible judgement value, so an attempt to judge > a case FISH would be ineffective. What you're thinking of is > "appropriate". Inappropriate judgements are still valid ones. > That distinction appears to have disappeared at some point: "The valid judgements for an inquiry case are as follows, based on the truth or falsity of the statement at the time the inquiry case was initiated (if its truth value changed at that time, then its initial truth value is used): " Specifically, the language 'based on the turth or falsity" implies to me that validity is dependent on the truth value.
