On Sun, 1 Jan 2017, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Far too powerful, given how difficult it can be for some clients to display anomalous Date: headers.For example, this message's Date: header claims that it was sent on Jan 1st, 2017.
I thought you meant "anomalous" as in weird format, yours looks normal to me.
If you're actually meaning "clients that cannot show any Date: headers easily at _all_", then I'm tempted to say those users deserve what they get.
Greetings, Ørjan.
