On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 at 21:52 Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > > > On Oct 4, 2017, at 9:35 AM, ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Nevermind, I think I had sent that when I didn't understand ttttpf and > such. Your report is just fine. I retract my CoE (if that's possible, idk > if it is) > > It’s not. However, I could deny this CoE, though, and common convention is > to deny a CoE if the claimant wants to withdraw it or no longer believes > the error is present. Given the other two CoEs raised about the report, I’m > going to publish a revision anyways, so it’s a moot point. > > It might be worth an experimental proposal to add withdrawal of CoEs, if > you want. It’s a surprisingly interesting problem: a CoE stops a report > from self-ratifying, but does withdrawing a CoE cause it to self-ratify on > the original schedule? A new schedule? Never? > > -o >
I believe that rule 2201 both makes clear you must explicitly deny the claims, and explains what happens vis-a-vis self-ratification.
