On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 at 01:57 Owen Jacobson <o...@grimoire.ca> wrote: > How does forking this out of the original (and quite old) rule change its > interaction with other rules, under rule 1030 (“Precedence between Rules”)? > I can’t see any obvious differences, but I wanted to draw attention to this > in case others with more insight spot anything. >
To the best of my efforts, there aren't any conflicts, so it shouldn't matter. This is a new and different definition of ENDORSE than what is presently > the case, though I suspect that for all possible Agoran Decisions under > current rules they are interchangeable. > > You’ve done away with RENOUNCE. To my knowledge I’ve never seen it used > anyways. > Denounce is fundamentally broken since the other person can just flip their vote to manipulate yours, if the voting strength is higher. I also have basically never seen it used. > > Is it automatic that if the final list is empty, the ballot is equivalent > to PRESENT? > Hmm, I guess it evaluates to an empty list. I don't think that's a problem though; the empty list is a valid vote that ends up working exactly like PRESENT except that it is not, formally, PRESENT. There is no meaningful distinction under the current rules.
