Do you mean IMPOSSIBLE? Given that there's no SHALL or SHALL NOTs associated
with owning ribbons I can't see the situation where it would be ILLEGAL...?
(I think you mean "if a player's Ribbon Ownership has an impossible value")
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Ribbon Preservation Act (AI=3){{{
> Amend rule 2438 by appending the following to the second paragraph: "If the
> rules are amended to change the types of Ribbon, if a player's Ribbon
> Ownership is subsequently illegal, then it is updated by
> removing all nonexistent types rather than resetting the entire value to
> default."
> }}}
>
> I pend this for 1 shiny.
>
> -Alexis
>
>
