I don't think that it matters given that it's not capitalized. The normal
interpretation principles here would mean a value which is not valid, I
think.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 at 17:08 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Do you mean IMPOSSIBLE? Given that there's no SHALL or SHALL NOTs
> associated
> with owning ribbons I can't see the situation where it would be ILLEGAL...?
>
> (I think you mean "if a player's Ribbon Ownership has an impossible value")
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> > Proposal: Ribbon Preservation Act (AI=3){{{
> > Amend rule 2438 by appending the following to the second paragraph: "If
> the rules are amended to change the types of Ribbon, if a player's Ribbon
> Ownership is subsequently illegal, then it is updated by
> > removing all nonexistent types rather than resetting the entire value to
> default."
> > }}}
> >
> > I pend this for 1 shiny.
> >
> > -Alexis
> >
> >
>
>
