I believe the report is overdue though, traditionally, we are lax on
officers who take over midweek.

Note that the new rules regarding your report mean you'll likely need to go
through some mailing list history to pick up the date that elections ended
for each office.

On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 21:09 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> oh. I wasn't sure whether or not "I ratify the below document, which is:
> {Just now, ATMunn won an election for ADoP. Just now, Alexis won an
> election for Prime Minister}." actually meant that I hold ADoP and Alexis
> holds PM. I guess I should have figured that out, however, since Alexis's
> vote counted double in the recent proposal resolution.
>
> When do I need to have my report published by, then?
>
> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Alexis Hunt <aler...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> E already did. You're the ADoP now!
>>
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 at 19:57 ATMunn . <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> That's true. I think I'd agree on that, especially for you, since you'll
>>> soon lose ADoP.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 7:54 PM, VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It is 4 and 14 days, isn't it? That still gives em 3 to 4 days, if I
>>>> prepare a report immediately after I'm allowed, which I doubt.
>>>>
>>>> I don't deny o's good officerlyness, I have complimented em on it many
>>>> times. Having said that, e is also the richest Agoran, a holder of 5
>>>> offices currently. It seems not unethical to take the easiest few of
>>>> eir offices.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>>>> >> By the by, I forgot o. is also the agronomist. I intend to deputize
>>>> >> for the position to publish its weekly report.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have to say, o has been a conscientious and hard-working Officer
>>>> that
>>>> > hasn't missed deadlines generally - it seems churlish to grab offices
>>>> > for a single missed week (I think it's been just one...?).
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> From V.J. Rada
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to