On Mon, 30 Oct 2017, Josh T wrote:
> Could you explain why you feel it necessary to define "private", is the
> common
> English definition not sufficient on some regard?
It's a bit ambiguous in the common definition.
- A "private" group could include more than 1 other person by common
definition. So if a third party is cc'd it's not clear whether that
counts as private.
- If "private" is strictly the opposite of "public", the discussion
forum could qualify as private (less likely interpretation).
