On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 20:39 +0000, Alexis Hunt wrote: > > Ahh, hmm, I think that might work provided we can get a non-player to > > call sufficient CFJs. Given the volume we couldn't do it with Shinies > > alone. > > I can do 5, but am unwilling to violate the rules as part of a > counterscam. (Also, I haven't thought of good topics for them yet.)
I think in the volume needed, we're looking at rules-violation regardless, someone can correct me if I'm wrong. (I also would not be up to rules- breaking to stop a Win. A dictatorship maybe but not just a win). If we *did* go that route, I'd number the CFJs fractionally and list them all under a single whole number, so I wouldn't use CFJs that actually have some interest for anyone.
