making all non-player cfjs dependent actions is not optimal. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: >> On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Aris Merchant wrote: > >> > b) Without 2 Objections. Players SHOULD object unless paying >> > with shinies is a significant barrier to the Caller's >> > ability to seek a resolution to the controversy. >> >> I might not be calling a lot of CFJs if this passes, then. > > I'd say not-being-a-player is a significant barrier that shouldn't > be objected to by anyone (unless the caller is massively abusing it) - > that was the standard I was aiming for anyway. > >
-- >From V.J. Rada
