I will stand, if no one else wants it. ---- Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Dec 8, 2017, at 8:59 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, G., for being willing to do the remaining Arbitor duties before > resigning. It's a bummer to see you resign, but I understand that real life > exists, and sometimes you don't have time to pay attention to a random email > Nomic game. :P > > I initiate an election for Arbitor. > > On 12/8/2017 7:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> Didn't get enough support, so: I resign the office of Arbitor. >> A deputy can claim the office by deputising to award appropriate Favours >> for the below-delivered judgements. >> Incoming Arbitor: I am not currently "interested" in being assigned >> judgements. >> Cheers, all! >> -G. >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications >>> -------------------------------------------- >>> [** = consider for rules annotation] >>> >>> >>> 3591 by Alexis: Self-Ratification of an Agoran Decision ratifies the >>> first result only. >>> >>> 3599-3601 by o: Details of Rule Change mechanics in proposals (hard to >>> summarize). >>> >>> 3602 by Telnaior: Not all abuses of power for personal gain are >>> prohibited by law. >>> >>> 3607 judged by ATMunn, Motion to Reconsider filed, DIMISSED by G. due to >>> questions on calling procedure. >>> >>> 3608 by Corona: Proposals not in the Proposal Pool cannot have an >>> imminence switch. >>> >>> 3609 by G.: Conditionals in Proposals have "effects" on the gamestate >>> even if the net result of the clause is no change. >>> >>> 3610 by V.J. Rada: Awarding Ribbons is broken for lack of a "by >>> announcement" method. >>> >>> 3611-12 by Aris: The rule on Black Cards violates the right to call >>> CFJs, so it never became a rule.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
