I'm afraid it's the winter freeze kicking in. It would be nice if we could have a collective agreement (please respond saying you agree) to all come back in January this time, rather than waiting to May. The inactivity is boring. Preferably, we could just keep going through the winter holiday, but I do understand that life get's in the way sometimes. I'll still be running Promotor as best I can, so keep the proposals coming! I'd really like to get the economy reform in by the end of the year, and I have some things of my own in progress (assuming we can meet quorum).
-Aris On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 6:22 PM VJ Rada <vijar...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sad that we appear to be winding down quite a lot without having > fixed the problems that have vexed us: I understand that part of this > is my distractions' fault. But it's also real life sucking and all > that. Thanks for your service, G> > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 12:59 PM, ATMunn <iamingodsa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you, G., for being willing to do the remaining Arbitor duties > before > > resigning. It's a bummer to see you resign, but I understand that real > life > > exists, and sometimes you don't have time to pay attention to a random > email > > Nomic game. :P > > > > I initiate an election for Arbitor. > > > > > > On 12/8/2017 7:06 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Didn't get enough support, so: I resign the office of Arbitor. > >> > >> A deputy can claim the office by deputising to award appropriate Favours > >> for the below-delivered judgements. > >> > >> Incoming Arbitor: I am not currently "interested" in being assigned > >> judgements. > >> > >> Cheers, all! > >> > >> -G. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >>> > >>> Recently-Delivered Verdicts and Implications > >>> -------------------------------------------- > >>> [** = consider for rules annotation] > >>> > >>> > >>> 3591 by Alexis: Self-Ratification of an Agoran Decision ratifies the > >>> first result only. > >>> > >>> 3599-3601 by o: Details of Rule Change mechanics in proposals (hard to > >>> summarize). > >>> > >>> 3602 by Telnaior: Not all abuses of power for personal gain are > >>> prohibited by law. > >>> > >>> 3607 judged by ATMunn, Motion to Reconsider filed, DIMISSED by G. due > to > >>> questions on calling procedure. > >>> > >>> 3608 by Corona: Proposals not in the Proposal Pool cannot have an > >>> imminence switch. > >>> > >>> 3609 by G.: Conditionals in Proposals have "effects" on the gamestate > >>> even if the net result of the clause is no change. > >>> > >>> 3610 by V.J. Rada: Awarding Ribbons is broken for lack of a "by > >>> announcement" method. > >>> > >>> 3611-12 by Aris: The rule on Black Cards violates the right to call > >>> CFJs, so it never became a rule. > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > From V.J. Rada >
