Once you've got it working, it's really easy to put it in the rules
by adding a new method like: "if something CAN be done Via
Interface, it is done by (using this interface)."

On Sun, 24 Dec 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I like the "accessible from mailing list" idea for a GNDT-like device. I'm
> totally inexperienced with making email bots though but the idea seems
> pretty clear: just state the action you'd want to do like if it was some
> kind of spell or something lol, like:
> 
> "Bot: CUDDLEBEAM makes a TRANSFER of 10 SHINIES to AGORA"
> 
> The bot catches that and then updates itself accordingly. Probably even
> replies to that with "Operation: Successful!" and a summary of the
> balances. Pretty much an ATM lol.
> 
> I've made chatbots before, so I'll try giving it a shot. I'd make it work
> via Contract too, I love that shit. Lets me make and test rules/mechanics
> without needing to prod into the ruleset.
> 
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 12:13 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>
> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 23 Dec 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > > GNDT = Generic Nomic Data Tracker, how BlogNomic tracks its gamestate
> > with
> > > no officers. Basically a web interface.
> > > https://wiki.blognomic.com/index.php?title=New_Player_
> > Guide#What_is_the_GNDT.3F
> > >
> > > MOO = MUD, Object-oriented. A MUD based on a object oriented
> > > database/programming language.
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOO
> > >
> > > MUD = Multi User Dungeon, an online multiplayer text based game, and the
> > > precursor to modern MMORPGs.
> > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUD
> >
> > So if someone is really keen on switching to one of these systems, the
> > way to do it is to actually implement it for something small but useful
> > (e.g. the Agoran Credit Union or other subgame).  Prove it works, and
> > people might be convinced.  We spend far far too much time in the
> > planning stages (of anything), and the proof is in the implementation
> > and debugging.  Too many ideas die on the vine - so ideas of "switching
> > all of Agora" in an abstract sense might spark a little discussion but
> > generally don't lead very far.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to