*emself; e, sorry. ~Corona
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:48 AM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doesn't G. have 5 votes by himself? He is PM and has 3 zombies. > > ~Corona > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 1:47 AM, Ned Strange <edwardostra...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I think G and I with our 6 votes between us can block anything, or at >> least anything with more than 1 AI. Funny. >> >> On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Aris Merchant >> <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Alright. You can consider it weakened in the way I suggested. However, >> > I need to see which of these changes has has consensus. Anyone else >> > have an opinion on the matter? I'll save this for next week's >> > distribution, given that your basic nerf is probably sufficient in the >> > near term. >> > >> > -Aris >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Most of them at this point. There's a few that are worse than others, >> some >> >> especially bad for returning zombies (forcing a returning zombie to >> >> deregister? what's that about?). But the version I proposed is what >> >> I'll personally vote for in this next proposal batch, nothing further. >> >> >> >> On Mon, 30 Apr 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: >> >>> Which provision most bothers you? I might be willing to drop the one >> zombie >> >>> limit if it strikes you as reasonable, it's probably unneeded with the >> >>> dependent actions change. I'd even consider extending the expiration >> to 90 >> >>> days, although having one just seems like common sense to me. Those >> are as >> >>> far as I can tell the only actual restrictions I've added? >> >>> >> >>> -Aris >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> From V.J. Rada >> > >
