This one I think? Did I use it wrong?
Rule 2479/5 (Power=1.7)
Official Justice
The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose
Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine
of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the
Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official
proceeding.
The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three times
a week.
On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Excuse me, but under which provision of which rule?
>
> -Aris
>
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I Object to the intent.
> >
> > I Levy a fine of 2 Blots on Corona (Summary Judgement) for this
> > abuse of office.
> >
> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> >> I object to Corona's intent to win by Apathy.
> >>
> >> I nominate myself for Treasuror.
> >>
> >> -twg
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> >>
> >> On June 10, 2018 8:12 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > [Sun Jun 10 22:12] This line is not a part of the report. Corona intends
> >> > to
> >> win by Apathy without objection.
> >>
>
