See Rule 2531, which requires, among other things, that the perpetrator did some action prohibited by law. You haven't named a rule that Corona violated.
-Aris On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > This one I think? Did I use it wrong? > > Rule 2479/5 (Power=1.7) > Official Justice > > The Referee CAN, subject to the provisions of this rule, impose > Summary Judgment on a person who plays the game by levying a fine > of up to 2 blots on em. Summary Judgement is imposed on the > Referee's own initiative, and not in response to any official > proceeding. > > The Referee CANNOT impose Summary Judgement more than three times > a week. > > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Aris Merchant wrote: >> Excuse me, but under which provision of which rule? >> >> -Aris >> >> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:13 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> > >> > >> > I Object to the intent. >> > >> > I Levy a fine of 2 Blots on Corona (Summary Judgement) for this >> > abuse of office. >> > >> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: >> >> I object to Corona's intent to win by Apathy. >> >> >> >> I nominate myself for Treasuror. >> >> >> >> -twg >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> >> >> >> On June 10, 2018 8:12 PM, Corona <liliumalbum.ag...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> > [Sun Jun 10 22:12] This line is not a part of the report. Corona >> >> > intends to >> >> win by Apathy without objection. >> >> >>
