We have a CFJ claiming that Powers of Attorney agreements are valid as
a matter of common law. Obviously all the Contracts infrastructure
forecloses such an agreement because of all the specifications in it.
But they would presumably work afterwards. See CFJs 3474 and 2397
(judged by you) and 1719

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:38 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Ned Strange wrote:
>> Will this work? No. But I hate complicated systems that nobody uses.
>> And this one is incomprehensible and not what the game is really about
>> anymore. So I'm making the following point.
>
> I wholly agree with you.  But can we add in a very simple stub that
> says something like "players can make agreements, and the agreements
> can include act-on-behalf" or something equally simple to empower
> that?
>



-- 
>From V.J. Rada

Reply via email to