You can fix decision uncertainty, but this unavoidably perpetuates the quorum
uncertainty. Any votes now are valid if and only if the voting period has been
extended, so their validity for determining quorum in the next batch will be
uncertain...
(Personally I'm abstaining on purpose so I'm decidedly not humiliated).
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Quorum on the Agoran Decisions on whether or not to adopt Proposals 8066-8076
> is either 5.0 or 7.0. There were 6 votes on each Decision.
>
> If quorum is 5.0, then I have a week in which to announce the result. And if
> it's 7.0, then the voting period is extended by a week. This means that I can
> still unambiguously resolve these Decisions, but only if one of the following
> slackers attempts to cast a vote soon - even PRESENT:
>
> ATMunn, Corona, CuddleBeam, G., omd, Trigon, V.J. Rada,
> Gaelan, nichdel, Ouri, pokes, Quazie, Telnaior and 天火狐.
>
> The aforementioned (active) slackers ought to be ashamed of themselves for
> bringing this confusion upon Agora. You people are why we can't have nice
> things. I expect better of you all in the future.
>
> If quorum on these Decisions is 5.0, then the above is a humiliating public
> reminder, courtesy of Rule 2168. (Otherwise, I suppose it is merely a
> humiliating public statement.)
>
> -twg
>
>
