A document sure, but: A *contract*? That’s the issue.
On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 10:17, Aris Merchant < thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > All they’ve done is agree to abide by a document. That wasn’t hidden. If > they do something based off that, then the probably will need to prove it, > at least to the judge. > > -Aris > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 1:15 AM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > About the evidence thing, wouldn’t the hidden-actions that G and DMar > need > > evidence as well that they have formally happened? > > > > Or, since there is no evidence, just like my own thing, it didn’t > actually > > happen? (Until its shown that it has, in which case reality suddenly > > changes to it like that newspaper in Back to the Future? Shröninger!) > > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 10:07, Aris Merchant < > > thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Generally, I think we’d expect you to present evidence that you were > > right. > > > Also, welcome back CuddleBeam. > > > > > > H. Herald, we don’t appear to have ever made CuddleBeam a scampster. > This > > > is a grave oversight. I (informally, but I’ll make it formal after > Patent > > > Petitions have passed if I have to) petition that immediate action be > > taken > > > to rectify this situation. > > > > > > -Aris > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 11:15 PM Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I’m curious about how CfJs and the gamestate would work with secret > > > > gamestate info like this. > > > > > > > > I become part of that contract. > > > > > > > > By virtue of that contract, I act on behalf of G. and D Margaux to > > > transfer > > > > all of their assets to myself. > > > > > > > > By virtue of that contract, I destroy that contract. > > > > > > > > Now, of course, what I’ve done could’ve been total bullshit but feel > > free > > > > to CfJ and present _evidence_ against what I’ve just done to prove me > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 at 01:12, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree to the exchanged Contract with this hash. -G. > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote: > > > > > > G. and I have exchanged a document that has text with the > following > > > > > SHA256 > > > > > > hash: > > > > > > > > > > > > 58629980096A5E997EC5CF62C04B59EBFBEEAF81DD4785B50CCF190E1F24CE2D > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree to be bound by that text and I agree and consent for that > > > text > > > > to > > > > > > be a contract between me and G., if G. likewise agrees. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
