On 10/9/2018 4:20 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2018, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2018-10-09 at 16:08 -0600, Reuben Staley wrote:
Since you are Slate A and Slate C, you either can't win the game by
announcement because Slate B players can as the former, or you can't win
the game by announcement because there is no mechanism for the latter to
do so.
Doesn't the existence of a (Slate A and Slate C) player mess up some of
the conditionals as to whether specific slates can win?
Also, does it require "all Slate B" to be able to win by announcement in
order to block Slate A from winning? Corona in particular is in Slate B
and can't win by announcement due to Blots.
Is there any defined precedent for when "players belonging to a set can
X" vs "there is a mechanism for players belonging to a set to be able to
X" that would be relevant here?
--
Trigon
