Not just that—at the time there was a rule that reenacted rules had to have 
“largely the same purpose” or something.

Gaelan

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm pretty sure that me trying to do both at the same time is why we had to
> converge the gamestate when PAoaM was broken.
> 
> --
> Trigon
> 
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019, 13:44 Ørjan Johansen <oer...@nvg.ntnu.no wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> 
>>> Re-enact Rule 2246 (name at repeal: Submitting a CFJ to the Justiciar),
>>> at Power-2, with the title "Submitting a CFJ to the Referee", and the
>>> following text:
>> 
>> I don't think you can change the title without a separate rule change,
>> although the reenactment provision doesn't actually mention titles at all.
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Ørjan.
>> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to