This may be a bit nit-picky, but I don't believe "withdraw" is defined
for rules, only "repeal".
Jason Cobb
On 7/6/19 10:52 AM, James Cook wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 at 14:38, James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
I submit a proposal as follows.
Title: Police Power
Actually, to get R. Lee potentially on board, I'll make the proposal
shorten the ruleset.
I withdraw the proposal I most recently submitted (title "Police Power").
I submit a proposal as follows.
Title: Administrative Reform and Police Power Omnibus
Co-authors: Jason Cobb
Adoption index: 1.7
Text:
Withdraw Rule 2597 (Line-item Veto).
In Rule 2557, replace the first paragraph with:
When the rules authorize an investigator to impose the Cold Hand
of Justice for a violation, e CAN do so by levying a fine of B on
the perp by announcement, within the following guidelines:
and add a new list item at the start of the list (that is, right after
the first paragraph), with the text:
- B is at least 1 and at most twice the base value of the
violation.
Retitle Rule 2557 to "Sentencing Guidelines".
[Comment: Rule 2557 is currently titled "Removing Blots". When I tried
to understand why, I noticed that the 2018-04-07 SLR lists two Rule
2557s, one of which actually is about removing blots, and the other of
which is titled "Sentencing Guidelines". The next SLR I could find is
published much later, 2018-10-14, and has R2557 in or close to its
current form. I don't know exactly what happened there.]
