On Sun, 7 Jul 2019 at 21:12, Aris Merchant <thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 3:36 PM omd <c.ome...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 7:52 AM James Cook <jc...@cs.berkeley.edu> wrote: > > > Withdraw Rule 2597 (Line-item Veto). > > > > Why that rule? It's only a few months old; there are a lot of other > > rules that are much more stale. > > It’s never been used, and IMO it’s more annoying than anything else.
Well, G. said e proposed the rule to illustrate a security hole in R106, which eir "power-limit precedence" proposal, soon to be adopted, is meant to fix. Should we could wait for someone to try to test that before repealing the rule? Personally I plan to keep voting "AGAINST if a Notice of Veto has been published..." on most proposals I'd otherwise vote FOR until the threat of unexpected last-minute vetos goes away. -- - Falsifian
