I'll be a good Agoran if such a proposal makes it through. But I'm also understanding of the reason this limit exists, even if I think 30 days is a bit much.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019, 3:16 PM ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk < ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Thu, 2019-07-25 at 07:59 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > idk, as much as I don't want nch to sit out for 30 days, we've had people > > deregister themselves to do a scam and in the past said "hey well that's > the > > price of scamming" (if it was accidental for non-scammy reasons we try to > > get em back definitely). Just a discussion not absolutely set to vote > > against this. -G. > > The Registrar's report has a "deregistered emself by mistake" entry for > a reason :-D > > This is a bit different, it's "deregistered emself intentionally > without realising the consequences". I'm not totally against giving > people a pass for that, even if it was part of a scam, but with a > caveat that they mustn't have gained any benefit from the scam attempt > (and only once per person, obviously). > > -- > ais523 > >
