Oh Lordy. POSSIBLE is a requirement for the following: 2154/53 - SHALL requirement to end unresolved elections 2160/20 - Deputization 2466/1 - Acting on behalf 2574/3 - SHALL requirement to resolve zombie-maintainance intents
Luckily, I think that POSSIBLE is obvious enough that it works even without a definition, so I don’t think this is a full-on “the rules haven’t been working” crisis. Gaelan > On Oct 6, 2019, at 7:52 PM, Jason Cobb <jason.e.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I submit the following proposal (sorry, I know this is after the draft): > > > Title: Anything is POSSIBLE > > AI: 3 > > Text: > > { > > Amend Rule 2152 ("Mother, May I?") by replacing the text "CAN:" with the text > "CAN, POSSIBLE:". > > ["POSSIBLE" is used in the Rules right now, but is never defined; this > defines it.] > > } > > > -- > Jason Cobb >